6 Comments

Many thanks Ashvin. Your meditation on the Catch-22 nature of knowing ourselves and humanity at ever deeper levels is a significant accompaniment for the apparently curious statement by Steiner in Knowledge of Higher Worlds.

This is the reason why everyone who desires to gain direct insight into the secrets of human nature must follow the golden rule of true Occultism. And the golden rule is this: For every one step that you take in the pursuit of the hidden knowledge, take three steps in the perfecting of your own character.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Angus.

BTW, will you be continuing the discussion with Jude-Neeme Samson on his Christology thesis? I found those discussions very elucidating!

Expand full comment

Yes we will be, Jude moved house and other complications led to the long pause. The next one will be recorded tomorrow, but it usually takes a few after that before I publish.

Expand full comment

brilliant! I always look forward to these essays and I think they are some of the most important on Substack

Expand full comment

Thank you, Max, that is great to hear and truly appreciated. Contemplating your own artistic work has played no small part in my inspiration to write!

Expand full comment

“The ancient Egyptians called the first founder of culture, who was human rather than divine, “Menes.” And they dated the human possibility of error from the same moment, because from then on human beings had to rely on the instrument of the brain. The ancient Orientals likewise gave the name “Manes” to the human being as thinker and called the first bearer of human thinking “Manu.” The Greeks called the first developer of the principle of human thought “Minos” with whom the legend of the labyrinth is associated. The fact that human I beings can fall into error is symbolized by the labyrinth. Labyrinths were first built at the time when the gods withdrew from human beings. They are, of course, images of the convolutions of the brain, in which the thinker can get lost. At the time of Minos people sensed that they had gradually moved away from being guided directly by the gods and were developing a new form of guidance in which the I experienced the influence of the higher spiritual world.”

[.....]

“In esotericism, a person who is able to see into the spiritual world is called a “clairvoyant.” But, just being a clairvoyant is not enough, because clairvoyants, though they can see in the supersensible world, cannot distinguish. Therefore, people who have developed the ability to distinguish between the beings and events of the higher worlds are called “initiates.” Initiation is what enables us to distinguish between various types of beings. People can be clairvoyant and see into the higher worlds without also being initiates. In ancient times, being able to distinguish between these beings was not especially important, for once the ancient mystery schools had brought their students to the point of clairvoyance, there was no great danger of making mistakes. Now, however, the danger of falling into error is very great. Therefore, in all esoteric schooling the development of clairvoyance must always be accompanied by initiation. As people become clairvoyant, they must also become able to distinguish between the particular types of supersensible beings and occurrences they perceive.

In modern times, the powers guiding humanity are faced with the special task of creating a balance between the principles of clairvoyance and initiation. At the beginning of the modern period, the leading spiritual teachers necessarily had to consider what I have just explained. As a matter of principle, therefore, the esoteric spiritual movement that is suited to our time works to establish the right relationship between clairvoyance and initiation. This balanced relationship became necessary when, in the thirteenth century, humanity underwent a crisis in regard to its faculty of higher cognition. Around the year 1250, in fact, we find the period in which people felt most cut off from the spiritual world.”

https://rsarchive.org/Books/GA015/English/AP1992/GA015_c02.html

Expand full comment